Experts Reviews · 2026 Ratings

The Best Air Quality Testing

We graded 9 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.

—typical jobMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).
98%say the price was fairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.
4.93★average ratingPlain average of every Google star rating we collected for these companies.
1.4%bad jobs (1–2★, 2 yrs)Share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months — or the 20 newest reviews when the company had fewer than 20 in that time.

From 656 Google reviews of 9 top-rated air quality testing nationwide. Updated November 6, 2026.

Find the right company for your job

Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.

Best air quality testing for mold inspection

Clear ✕
1Fast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area logoFast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area★ 4.97 on this job36 jobs reviewedHow Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Mold inspection”:Stars on this job 55%4.97★Number of such jobs 25%36Overall Experts Score 20%97Job match= 97Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.93★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.97

Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Mold inspection” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.

What customers said about mold inspection

Rob1 reviewTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · a month ago★★★★★
Fast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area logoFast Mold Testing - San Francisco…

Replied promptly and had an inspector out the next day. The report came back quickly after that and they helped me find contractors to remediate the issue.

Mold inspectionMold samplingMold remediation
Panda5 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · a month ago★★★★★
Fast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area logoFast Mold Testing - San Francisco…

Very professional and very knowledgeable. They helped us figure out it’s a ventilation issue and what would need to be done to solve the mold issue’s in the future.definitely would recommend them to family and friends.

Reasonable priceMold inspectionRental property inspections
Greg4 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · a month ago★★★★★
Fast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area logoFast Mold Testing - San Francisco…

Professional, very prompt, and thorough. We had a test scheduled the same day we called them, and a report with non 48 hours of the test.

Reasonable priceMold inspection
Eric1 reviewTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · a month ago★★★★★
Fast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area logoFast Mold Testing - San Francisco…

Fast Mold Testing was great and professional! They got back to my initial inspection request within 30 minutes and scheduled an appointment for the next day. The inspection itself went smoothly, with the employees being professionals.

Reasonable priceMold inspectionIndoor allergen samplingMold sampling
Justin1 reviewTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 2 months ago★★★★★
Fast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area logoFast Mold Testing - San Francisco…

This company is amazing! I was able to quickly schedule my appointment and a technician arrived in the next two days. The technician was very thorough and took time to inspect every aspect of my bathrooms. Afterwards, the technician took time to carefully explain the next steps given that there was extensive mild…

Great priceMold inspection
jojo1 reviewTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 months ago★★★★★
Fast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area logoFast Mold Testing - San Francisco…

Contacted Fast Mold for tenants issue with some mold. Worked with Autumn who was very courteous, knowledgeable and professional in answer my questions and what their services entailed and costs. She followed up promptly with email as I did my due diligence with other companies. Got back with Autumn who was very…

Reasonable priceMold inspectionIndoor allergen sampling

Overall ratings

Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of air quality testing).

#CompanyScoreExperts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown.FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (54%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.Reliability (24%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.Craft & service (0%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.Value (14%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.Momentum (0%): Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.Replies to reviews (7%): How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.One letter per factor score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = below 20.★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps.Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews).
1California Healthy Home Inspections & Remediation Inc. logoCalifornia Healthy Home Inspections & Remediation Inc.San Francisco, CAA 98How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%98+57.5Reliability 26%96+25Value 15%100+15.2Experts Score= 98Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAA–4.99—
2Your Safe and Healthy Home logoYour Safe and Healthy HomeAkron, OHA 98How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%98+67.8Reliability 31%97+29.8Experts Score= 98Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA––A–5.00—
3Fast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay Area logoFast Mold Testing - San Francisco Bay AreaSan Francisco, CAA 97How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%99+58.1Reliability 26%99+25.8Value 15%87+13.2Experts Score= 97Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA–AA–4.99—
4AMT Mold Testing & Indoor Air Quality ConsultingPemberton, NJA 95How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%95+55.8Reliability 26%93+24.3Value 15%100+15.2Experts Score= 95Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAA–4.92—
5Environmental Safety Management Corporation logoEnvironmental Safety Management CorporationPemberton, NJA 95How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%94+65.1Reliability 31%97+29.8Experts Score= 95Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA––A–4.91—
6HEPA Environmental Services, Inc. logoHEPA Environmental Services, Inc.Akron, OHA 92How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 64%91+57.8Reliability 28%97+27.4Replies to reviews 8%86+7.1Experts Score= 92Not enough data for value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA––AA4.88—
7Acer Associates, LLC - Environmental, GPR, Geotechnical logoAcer Associates, LLC - Environmental, GPR, GeotechnicalPemberton, NJB 77How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%79+54.7Reliability 31%71+21.8Experts Score= 77Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.BB––A–4.69—
8A-1 Certified Environmental Services logoA-1 Certified Environmental ServicesSan Francisco, CAB 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%72+39.3Reliability 24%63+15.3Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%46+3.3Momentum penalty46−5.4Experts Score= 67Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.BBAACC4.81—
9Summit Environmental Tech logoSummit Environmental TechAkron, OHC 52How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 64%56+35.6Reliability 28%54+15.2Replies to reviews 8%16+1.3Experts Score= 52Not enough data for value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.CC–––F4.45—

What jobs cost

What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.

JobLow25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this.TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this.FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.

Air Quality Testing at a glance

How the 9 air quality testing we rated compare, and what customers praise most.

Experts Score grades

A = score 80+, F = below 20.

  • Grade A667%
  • Grade B222%
  • Grade C111%
  • Grade D00%
  • Grade F00%

Google ratings

Average stars per company.

  • 4.90★ and up556%
  • 4.80–4.89★222%
  • 4.60–4.79★111%
  • Below 4.60★111%

What customers praise

Share of Google review highlights.

  • Quality10322%
  • Professionalism12427%
  • Responsiveness11926%
  • Punctuality286%
  • Value9120%

Was the price fair?

All price verdicts left with reviews.

  • Great price2631%
  • Reasonable5263%
  • Overpriced22%
  • Not sure34%

Price verdicts by year

Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.

2025
2026

How we grade

Satisfaction (54%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.

Reliability (24%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.

Craft & service (penalty, up to −10) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.

Value (14%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.

Momentum (penalty, up to −10) — Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.

Replies to reviews (7%) — How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.