Locksmiths · Sacramento, CA

Is ACCESS LOCAL LOCKSMITH INC any good?

Our verdict: one of the best — #1 of 20 locksmiths, better than 95%. Customers single out its satisfaction and reliability; accountability is where it trails.

👍 Strengths

Satisfaction — better than 98% of peers

Reliability — better than 88% of peers

Value — better than 78% of peers

👎 Watch-outs

No weak spots against peers.

ACCESS LOCAL LOCKSMITH INC for security door locks

Clear ✕

4 customers reviewed a security door locks job here and rated it 5.00★. Most paid $150–200. For this job it ranks #2 of 9 locksmiths we track.

★★★★★ HT · 2 months ago

I called Rafael for an estimate. He ended up helping me the same day to change the codes on keypad deadbolt locks that came with the house I bought in addition to rekeying them. He was meticulous, patient, and friendly. Normally, I’d get multiple estimates for a job, but I had such a positive experience with him…

Paid $150–200Not sureLock rekeyingSecurity door locks
★★★★★ Christine · a year ago

A technician came by fast re-keyed my lock, highly recommended great mobile locksmith services in West Sacramento.

Paid $40–60Great priceBuilding lockoutsLock rekeyingDoor lock & bolt hardware repair

Price

$$$$
$146-16% vs typical locksmiths

Bar = middle half of what customers paid · gold mark = category median.

Questions about ACCESS LOCAL LOCKSMITH INC

Is ACCESS LOCAL LOCKSMITH INC good?

Yes by most measures: 5.0★ from 348 Google reviews and an Experts Score of 82/100 (grade A), #1 of 20 locksmiths we track. 0% of reviews in the last two years were 1–2★ (category average 1.2%).

How much does ACCESS LOCAL LOCKSMITH INC charge?

Customers reported a typical bill of $146 (middle half $101–$184), 16% below the locksmiths median of $173.

What do customers hire ACCESS LOCAL LOCKSMITH INC for?

Mostly lock rekeying (47), building lockouts (34), door lock & bolt hardware repair (19), installation (14).

Does the owner respond to complaints?

The owner replied to null% of 1–3★ reviews (category: 41%).

Compare with