Wildlife Removal Services · Robbinsdale, MN

Is Minnesota Wild Animal Management any good?

Our verdict: mixed — #88 of 102 wildlife removal services, better than 14%. Customers single out its momentum and craft & service; value is where it trails.

👍 Strengths

Momentum — better than 74% of peers

👎 Watch-outs

Reliability — 15th percentile

Accountability — 12th percentile

Value — 7th percentile

Price $$$$: 243% above typical

Minnesota Wild Animal Management for bee extermination

Clear ✕

1 customers reviewed a bee extermination job here and rated it 5.00★.

All 1 Google reviews tagged “Bee extermination”

Guardian2 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 5 years ago★★★★★

We've had nothing but great experiences with MN Wild Animal Management! They've always been very prompt, professional and knowledgeable. Removed 6 squirrels from our property and we have had no pest reports since.

Bee exterminationGeneral pest inspectionRodent extermination+ Responsiveness+ Quality+ Professionalism

Price

$$$$
$347+243% vs typical wildlife removal services

Bar = middle half of what customers paid · gold mark = category median.

Questions about Minnesota Wild Animal Management

Is Minnesota Wild Animal Management good?

Yes by most measures: 4.8★ from 62 Google reviews and an Experts Score of 27/100 (grade D), #88 of 102 wildlife removal services we track. 4.5% of reviews in the last two years were 1–2★ (category average 1.6%).

How much does Minnesota Wild Animal Management charge?

Customers reported a typical bill of $347 (middle half $273–$441), 243% above the wildlife removal services median of $101.

What do customers hire Minnesota Wild Animal Management for?

Mostly rodent extermination (12), general wildlife removal (10), general pest inspection (9), ant extermination (8).

Does the owner respond to complaints?

The owner replied to 0% of 1–3★ reviews (category: 65%).

Compare with