Experts Reviews · Company report
Network Roofing & Construction logoHow the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%54+18.9Reliability 15%41+6.1Craft & service 20%26+5.2Value 10%72+7.2Momentum 8%74+5.9Track record 7%25+1.8Accountability 5%20+1Experts Score= 46Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.46SCORE

Network Roofing & Construction

Dallas, TX · Grade CLetter from the Experts Score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = under 20. · #41Position by Experts Score among all companies we track in this category. of 70 roofing contractors · 5.0★ from 164 Google reviews

Report card

Percentile vs other roofing contractors (100 = best)Percentile vs other companies in the category: 70 means better than 70% of them.. Strongest: momentum and value; weakest: accountability.

SatisfactionSatisfaction · 35% of the scoreRecency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.Network Roofing & Construction is better than 54% of roofing contractors.C
54
ReliabilityReliability · 15% of the scoreHow rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).Network Roofing & Construction is better than 41% of roofing contractors.C
41
Craft & serviceCraft & service · 20% of the scoreGoogle review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.Network Roofing & Construction is better than 26% of roofing contractors.D
26
ValueValue · 10% of the scoreCustomers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.Network Roofing & Construction is better than 72% of roofing contractors.B
72
MomentumMomentum · 8% of the scoreLast 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.Network Roofing & Construction is better than 74% of roofing contractors.B
74
Track recordTrack record · 7% of the scoreReview volume and years with reviews.Network Roofing & Construction is better than 25% of roofing contractors.D
25
AccountabilityAccountability · 5% of the scoreOwner replies to 1–3★ reviews.Network Roofing & Construction is better than 20% of roofing contractors.D
20

Reviews for your job

Customers hired Network Roofing & Construction for 7 kinds of job.

Network Roofing & Construction for skylight installation

Clear ✕
Jobs reviewedHow many Google reviews are tagged with this job.2
★ on this jobAverage stars on the reviews where the customer tagged this exact job (Google’s “Services” field).5.00
Usually paidThe price range customers picked most often for this job.—

All 2 Google reviews tagged “Skylight installation”

Montoya3 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · Edited 4 years ago★★★★★

Anthony and Network did an awesome job on my home. I couldn’t be any happier, call them you will not be disappointed!

Gutter installationRoof installationSkylight installation+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality
Jeff6 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · Edited 4 years ago★★★★★

Service was exceptional. On time Highly recommend Clean up was above and beyond.

Attic ventingGutter installationGutter repairs+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality

Price

$6.9k-31% vs typical roofing contractors

Bar = middle half of what customers paid · gold mark = category median.

Price verdictsGoogle asks reviewers whether the price was great, reasonable or overpriced; these are their answers.

Great price 65%Reasonable 35%Overpriced 0%Not sure 0%

Jobs customers hired them for

JobReviewsCategory typical
Roof installation31$11k–$23k
Roof repair for storm & wind damage26$2.0k–$18k
Gutter installation24$638–$4.1k
Roof inspection16$539–$12k
Roof repair7$638–$8.2k
Gutter repairs5$371–$2.3k
Skylight installation2—

Compare with