How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%67+29.3Reliability 19%48+9Value 13%94+11.8Momentum 10%29+2.9Track record 9%6+0.5Accountability 6%29+1.8Experts Score= 55Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.55SCOREQueen Creek Irrigation & Sprinkler
Better than 50% of lawn care services · #13 of 26
Queen Creek Irrigation & Sprinkler for landscaping
Clear ✕All 3 Google reviews tagged “Landscaping”
Replaced old poly tube that was leaking in front and back yards. David recommended PVC for replacement. Great price and fast response time. 6 months later I had a minor issue and he came out and replaced problem part. No fuss or hassle just fast excellent service. Today I had him arrange to refresh my gravel…
Dave was awesome. We went over my project multiple times and walked out what I wanted. He was on time and completed the project as stated. I will definitely hire him for future work.
David was so helpful , he listened to what I wanted and made sure everything was working properly and wouldn't take a dime until I was satisfied. I am very happy with the work he did and I would recommend him to anyone needing landscape work done.
vs category
Blue = Queen, grey = lawn care services average
Rating over time
Price
Not enough reviews with a price yet.
Score factorsHow the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%67+29.3Reliability 19%48+9Value 13%94+11.8Momentum 10%29+2.9Track record 9%6+0.5Accountability 6%29+1.8Experts Score= 55Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.
Praised for
Google highlights · percentile vs peersGoogle review highlights (Quality, Professionalism…): positive minus negative mentions per review, as a percentile vs peers.