Experts Reviews · Company report
Wolf Moving logoHow the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%78+34.1Reliability 19%88+16.5Value 13%98+12.3Momentum 10%82+8.2Track record 9%22+1.9Accountability 6%88+5.5Experts Score= 78Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.78SCORE

Wolf Moving

Raleigh, NC · Grade BLetter from the Experts Score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = under 20. · #4Position by Experts Score among all companies we track in this category. of 30 packing services · 4.9★ from 308 Google reviews

Report card

Percentile vs other packing services (100 = best)Percentile vs other companies in the category: 70 means better than 70% of them.. Strongest: value and reliability; weakest: track record.

SatisfactionSatisfaction · 35% of the scoreRecency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.Wolf Moving is better than 78% of packing services.B
78
ReliabilityReliability · 15% of the scoreHow rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).Wolf Moving is better than 88% of packing services.A
88
Craft & serviceCraft & service · 20% of the scoreGoogle review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.Wolf Moving is better than —% of packing services.–
—
ValueValue · 10% of the scoreCustomers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.Wolf Moving is better than 98% of packing services.A
98
MomentumMomentum · 8% of the scoreLast 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.Wolf Moving is better than 82% of packing services.A
82
Track recordTrack record · 7% of the scoreReview volume and years with reviews.Wolf Moving is better than 22% of packing services.D
22
AccountabilityAccountability · 5% of the scoreOwner replies to 1–3★ reviews.Wolf Moving is better than 88% of packing services.A
88

Reviews for your job

Customers hired Wolf Moving for 8 kinds of job.

Wolf Moving for senior moving

Clear ✕
Jobs reviewedHow many Google reviews are tagged with this job.2
★ on this jobAverage stars on the reviews where the customer tagged this exact job (Google’s “Services” field).5.00
Usually paidThe price range customers picked most often for this job.—
Category typicalWhat the middle half of customers paid for this job across all companies in the category.$633–$1.5k
Said fairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.100%

All 2 Google reviews tagged “Senior moving”

George4 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · Edited a year ago★★★★★

Great Move From beginning to end everything was handled very professionally. Devon & John showed up on time, They took the time to wrap everything and then moved everything with care. At my new home they asked where every piece was going and put it exactly as I requested. I couldn't be more pleased with the move and the price.

Great priceSenior moving
Camille5 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · a year ago★★★★★

This team of movers was outstanding! Clearly experienced, fast but not sloppy, and worked together. Plus on the hottest day of the year to date! 🥵🥵 I was very pleased and would definitely recommend.

Reasonable priceSenior moving

Price

$1.4k+27% vs typical packing services

Bar = middle half of what customers paid · gold mark = category median.

Price verdictsGoogle asks reviewers whether the price was great, reasonable or overpriced; these are their answers.

Great price 57%Reasonable 42%Overpriced 0%Not sure 1%

Jobs customers hired them for

Compare with