The Best Facial Services
We graded 24 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.
From 7,520 Google reviews of 24 top-rated facial services nationwide. Updated October 25, 2026.
Find the right company for your job
Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.
Best facial services for leg hair removal
Clear ✕Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Leg hair removal” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.
What customers said about leg hair removal
I love coming to spoiled! It’s the best in town. Jada was amazing as always- efficient and knowledgeable!
Parie Med Spa's staff and the estheticians are really nice and friendly. They make you feel welcomed. And they take care of your skin really well. Come visit them.
I just had my first visit to Spoiled Aesthetics for a laser hair removal touch-up on my underarms, and I was so impressed! I originally completed a full series of laser treatments a few years ago elsewhere, but after about three years I started noticing some hair growing back, so I knew it was time for a touch-up.…
I had such a wonderful experience with the Spoiled Aesthetics team! Everyone was incredibly attentive, super sweet, and genuinely made me feel comfortable from the moment I walked in. They were also very efficient and respectful of my time while still making sure all of my questions were answered thoroughly. You can…
Such a welcoming experience! I got my under arms done and felt NO pain at any point. Will definitely be recommending family and friends here! Justine was amazing and truly made me feel comfortable. Can’t wait for my next session!
I had such a great experience today at spoiled aesthetics. My technician was Molllie, she was very welcoming and made sure I was comfortable for my laser appointment.
Overall ratings
Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Weighted average of 7 percentiles vs other companies in the category: satisfaction 35%, workmanship 20%, reliability 15%, value 10%, momentum 8%, track record 7%, owner replies 5%. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of facial services).
| # | Company | ScoreExperts Score (0–100)Weighted average of 7 percentiles vs other companies in the category: satisfaction 35%, workmanship 20%, reliability 15%, value 10%, momentum 8%, track record 7%, owner replies 5%. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. | FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (35%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.Reliability (15%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).Craft & service (20%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.Value (10%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.Momentum (8%): Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.Track record (7%): Review volume and years with reviews.Accountability (5%): Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.One letter per factor, by percentile among peers: A = top 20%, B = next 20%, and so on. | ★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps. | Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews). |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B 79How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%94+41.1Reliability 19%94+17.6Value 13%91+11.4Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%23+2Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 79Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–ACDD | 5.00 | — | |
| 2 | B 78How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%98+42.9Reliability 19%98+18.4Value 13%41+5.1Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%48+4.2Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 78Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–CCCD | 5.00 | — | |
| 3 | Charnel SpaLas Vegas, NV | B 76How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%73+25.5Reliability 15%81+12.2Craft & service 20%88+17.6Value 10%47+4.7Momentum 8%89+7.1Track record 7%90+6.3Accountability 5%52+2.6Experts Score= 76Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BAACAAC | 4.98 | — |
| 4 | B 70How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%85+37.2Reliability 19%81+15.2Value 13%78+9.8Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%6+0.5Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 70Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–BCFD | 5.00 | — | |
| 5 | B 70How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%65+28.4Reliability 19%90+16.9Value 13%59+7.4Momentum 10%76+7.6Track record 9%73+6.4Accountability 6%52+3.3Experts Score= 70Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BA–CBBC | 4.97 | — | |
| 6 | B 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%81+40.5Reliability 21%81+17.4Momentum 11%54+6.2Track record 10%15+1.5Accountability 7%25+1.8Experts Score= 67Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA––CFD | 5.00 | — | |
| 7 | B 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%77+33.7Reliability 19%69+12.9Value 13%97+12.1Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%19+1.7Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 67Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BB–ACFD | 5.00 | — | |
| 8 | B 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%90+39.4Reliability 19%73+13.7Value 13%22+2.8Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%52+4.6Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 67Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AB–DCCD | 5.00 | $184 | |
| 9 | C 58How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%69+34.5Reliability 21%60+12.9Momentum 11%54+6.2Track record 10%27+2.7Accountability 7%25+1.8Experts Score= 58Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BB––CDD | 5.00 | — | |
| 10 | C 57How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%52+26Reliability 21%56+12Momentum 11%54+6.2Track record 10%56+5.6Accountability 7%98+7Experts Score= 57Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | CC––CCA | 4.95 | $73 | |
| 11 | Luminous Glow Skin and LaserBuckeye, AZ | C 52How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%60+26.2Reliability 19%65+12.2Value 13%9+1.1Momentum 10%85+8.5Track record 9%31+2.7Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 52Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BB–FADD | 4.98 | — |
| 12 | C 48How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%31+10.9Reliability 15%27+4.1Craft & service 20%63+12.6Value 10%34+3.4Momentum 8%98+7.8Track record 7%85+6Accountability 5%60+3Experts Score= 48Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | DDBDAAB | 4.89 | — |
What jobs cost
What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.
| Job | Low25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this. | TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range). | High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this. | FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedicure | $50 | $66 | $81 | 0% |
| Nail art | $71 | $86 | $103 | 0% |
| Acrylic nails | $53 | $66 | $79 | 0% |
| Gel manicures | $48 | $66 | $79 | 0% |
| Nail extensions | $63 | $72 | $89 | 0% |
Was the price fair?
All price verdicts left with reviews.
Price verdicts by year
Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.
How we grade
Satisfaction (35%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.
Reliability (15%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).
Craft & service (20%) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.
Value (10%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.
Momentum (8%) — Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.
Track record (7%) — Review volume and years with reviews.
Accountability (5%) — Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.