The Best Facial Services
We graded 24 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.
From 7,520 Google reviews of 24 top-rated facial services nationwide. Updated October 25, 2026.
Find the right company for your job
Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.
Best facial services for sculptra treatments
Clear ✕Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Sculptra treatments” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.
What customers said about sculptra treatments
I had so much anxiety going in for my first sculpture treatment at Advanced Aesthetics Rainbow Office! Chena Rivera was my aesthetician. Her and her assistant was so amazing at keeping me calm. Her assistant kept my mind off of everything my rubbing my arm and shoulder as Chena did my treatment. She was so gentle…
I love Jade! She’s super sweet and educated! She made me feel comfortable and I’m very happy with the results
I love the Refresh Room! Both Paige and Desirae are highly skilled and they listen and work with you to achieve the results you desire. I have been going there for several yrs and they’ve helped me to maintain a lovely, natural appearance. Never overdone… just a younger, fresher version of yourself and no matter…
Mary, is the best . Her employees have been there for years . That says a lot about her ❤️
Had a great experience with Dao! She is very knowledgeable and personable. I have complete trust with Advanced Aesthetics.
Knowledgeable aestheticians Staff is wonderful, friendly and knows there stuff which is much appreciated Come out feeling like a new person
Overall ratings
Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Weighted average of 7 percentiles vs other companies in the category: satisfaction 35%, workmanship 20%, reliability 15%, value 10%, momentum 8%, track record 7%, owner replies 5%. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of facial services).
| # | Company | ScoreExperts Score (0–100)Weighted average of 7 percentiles vs other companies in the category: satisfaction 35%, workmanship 20%, reliability 15%, value 10%, momentum 8%, track record 7%, owner replies 5%. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. | FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (35%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.Reliability (15%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).Craft & service (20%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.Value (10%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.Momentum (8%): Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.Track record (7%): Review volume and years with reviews.Accountability (5%): Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.One letter per factor, by percentile among peers: A = top 20%, B = next 20%, and so on. | ★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps. | Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews). |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B 79How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%94+41.1Reliability 19%94+17.6Value 13%91+11.4Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%23+2Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 79Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–ACDD | 5.00 | — | |
| 2 | B 78How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%98+42.9Reliability 19%98+18.4Value 13%41+5.1Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%48+4.2Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 78Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–CCCD | 5.00 | — | |
| 3 | Charnel SpaLas Vegas, NV | B 76How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%73+25.5Reliability 15%81+12.2Craft & service 20%88+17.6Value 10%47+4.7Momentum 8%89+7.1Track record 7%90+6.3Accountability 5%52+2.6Experts Score= 76Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BAACAAC | 4.98 | — |
| 4 | B 70How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%85+37.2Reliability 19%81+15.2Value 13%78+9.8Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%6+0.5Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 70Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–BCFD | 5.00 | — | |
| 5 | B 70How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%65+28.4Reliability 19%90+16.9Value 13%59+7.4Momentum 10%76+7.6Track record 9%73+6.4Accountability 6%52+3.3Experts Score= 70Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BA–CBBC | 4.97 | — | |
| 6 | B 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%81+40.5Reliability 21%81+17.4Momentum 11%54+6.2Track record 10%15+1.5Accountability 7%25+1.8Experts Score= 67Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA––CFD | 5.00 | — | |
| 7 | B 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%77+33.7Reliability 19%69+12.9Value 13%97+12.1Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%19+1.7Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 67Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BB–ACFD | 5.00 | — | |
| 8 | B 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%90+39.4Reliability 19%73+13.7Value 13%22+2.8Momentum 10%54+5.4Track record 9%52+4.6Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 67Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AB–DCCD | 5.00 | $184 | |
| 9 | C 58How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%69+34.5Reliability 21%60+12.9Momentum 11%54+6.2Track record 10%27+2.7Accountability 7%25+1.8Experts Score= 58Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BB––CDD | 5.00 | — | |
| 10 | C 57How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%52+26Reliability 21%56+12Momentum 11%54+6.2Track record 10%56+5.6Accountability 7%98+7Experts Score= 57Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | CC––CCA | 4.95 | $73 | |
| 11 | Luminous Glow Skin and LaserBuckeye, AZ | C 52How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%60+26.2Reliability 19%65+12.2Value 13%9+1.1Momentum 10%85+8.5Track record 9%31+2.7Accountability 6%25+1.6Experts Score= 52Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BB–FADD | 4.98 | — |
| 12 | C 48How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%31+10.9Reliability 15%27+4.1Craft & service 20%63+12.6Value 10%34+3.4Momentum 8%98+7.8Track record 7%85+6Accountability 5%60+3Experts Score= 48Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | DDBDAAB | 4.89 | — |
What jobs cost
What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.
| Job | Low25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this. | TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range). | High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this. | FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedicure | $50 | $66 | $81 | 0% |
| Nail art | $71 | $86 | $103 | 0% |
| Acrylic nails | $53 | $66 | $79 | 0% |
| Gel manicures | $48 | $66 | $79 | 0% |
| Nail extensions | $63 | $72 | $89 | 0% |
Was the price fair?
All price verdicts left with reviews.
Price verdicts by year
Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.
How we grade
Satisfaction (35%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.
Reliability (15%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).
Craft & service (20%) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.
Value (10%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.
Momentum (8%) — Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.
Track record (7%) — Review volume and years with reviews.
Accountability (5%) — Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.