Experts Reviews · 2026 Ratings

The Best Hazardous Material Removal in Oregon

We graded 9 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.

—typical jobMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).
98%say the price was fairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.
4.86★average ratingPlain average of every Google star rating we collected for these companies.
2.5%bad jobs (1–2★, 2 yrs)Share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months — or the 20 newest reviews when the company had fewer than 20 in that time.

From 20,736 Google reviews of 184 top-rated hazardous material removal nationwide; 9 of them in Oregon. Updated November 9, 2026.

Find the right company for your job

Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.

Best hazardous material removal in Oregon for water damage-related mold removal

Clear ✕
1Certified Indoor Environmental logoCertified Indoor Environmental★ 4.92 on this job76 jobs reviewedHow Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Water damage-related mold removal”:Stars on this job 55%4.92★Number of such jobs 25%76Overall Experts Score 20%71Job match= 88Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.86★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.88
2Pure Environmental logoPure Environmental★ 5.00 on this job6 jobs reviewedHow Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Water damage-related mold removal”:Stars on this job 55%5.00★Number of such jobs 25%6Overall Experts Score 20%65Job match= 73Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.86★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.73

Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Water damage-related mold removal” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.

What customers said about water damage-related mold removal

Kate5 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 3 years ago★★★★★
Pure Environmental logoPure Environmental

Andy at Pure Environmental is our go-to for issues related to mold, smoke damage and water/humidity mitigation. We have worked with Andy and his crew at 5+ locations and are continuously impressed with the depth of his expertise, professionalism and response time. Beyond getting the job done, he is also warm and…

Fire damage cleanup & repairMold cleaningMold damage restoration+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality
Christian5 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 years ago★★★★★
Certified Indoor Environmental logoCertified Indoor Environmental

They came in and did some investigating and got back to us quickly with a plan of action, cost, and schedule. They followed through on everything in a timely manner and gave us tons of pictures and reports for our records and to help our tenants feel safe.

Water damage-related cleanup & repairMold inspectionWater damage-related mold removal+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality
David5 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 years ago★★★★★
Certified Indoor Environmental logoCertified Indoor Environmental

Simply the best! My job crew were highly trained and professional -- and they were not to busy for being plesant to talk with. All my questions were answered and I had full confidence the Job was being done right! Arrived in a new truck - all of their equipment was well maintained and organized -- the job site was…

Mold inspectionWater damage-related mold removal
MichaelLocal Guide · 53 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 years ago★★★★★
Certified Indoor Environmental logoCertified Indoor Environmental

Quality people and good communication. Unlike many contractors they showed up on time and were efficient and did a good cleanup.

Mold inspectionWater damage-related mold removal+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality
Lauren9 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 years ago★★★★★
Certified Indoor Environmental logoCertified Indoor Environmental

i love using certified. I always get residents who would rather trust someone who works in the field, than a manager who doesn't work with growth. You guys are always so willing to come out and explain to the residents what's causing the growth. Very nice to work with as well! You guys are usually the first to call in terms of vendors

Mold inspectionWater damage-related mold removal+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality
TerriLocal Guide · 39 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 years ago★★★★★
Certified Indoor Environmental logoCertified Indoor Environmental

Great experience with customer service, scheduling and tech's doing the work. Good communication. Terri Boughton, Licensed Realtor in Oregon

Mold inspectionWater damage-related mold removal+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Professionalism

Overall ratings

Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of hazardous material removal).

#CompanyScoreExperts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown.FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (54%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.Reliability (24%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.Craft & service (0%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.Value (14%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.Momentum (0%): Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.Replies to reviews (7%): How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.One letter per factor score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = below 20.★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps.Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews).
1M&M ABATEMENT & RESTORATION LLC logoM&M ABATEMENT & RESTORATION LLCTigard, ORA 97How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%98+67.8Reliability 31%95+29.2Experts Score= 97Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA––A–5.00—
2Mold Testing Services of Oregon logoMold Testing Services of OregonTigard, ORA 95How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%96+52.4Reliability 24%95+23Value 14%97+13.7Replies to reviews 7%90+6.4Craft & service penalty99−0.1Experts Score= 95Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAAA4.96—
3NW Environmental Solutions | Mold & Asbestos Removal logoNW Environmental Solutions | Mold & Asbestos RemovalTigard, ORA 91How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%92+63.7Reliability 31%89+27.4Experts Score= 91Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA––A–4.92—
4AccuGuard Environmental® logoAccuGuard Environmental®Tigard, ORA 91How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%91+63Reliability 31%92+28.3Experts Score= 91Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA––A–4.90—
5Alpha Environmental Services logoAlpha Environmental ServicesTigard, ORB 78How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%77+42Reliability 24%72+17.5Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%83+5.9Craft & service penalty92−0.8Momentum penalty89−1.1Experts Score= 78Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.BBAAAA4.80—
6Atlas Labs, Inc. logoAtlas Labs, Inc.Tigard, ORB 78How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%83+45.3Reliability 24%75+18.2Value 14%93+13.2Replies to reviews 7%31+2.2Craft & service penalty97−0.3Experts Score= 78Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.ABAAAD4.82—
7Certified Indoor Environmental logoCertified Indoor EnvironmentalTigard, ORB 71How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%81+44.2Reliability 24%51+12.4Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%48+3.4Craft & service penalty73−2.7Experts Score= 71Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.ACBA–C4.89—
8Pure Environmental logoPure EnvironmentalTigard, ORB 65How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%66+36Reliability 24%41+9.9Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%100+7.1Craft & service penalty97−0.3Momentum penalty77−2.3Experts Score= 65Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.BCAABA4.73—
9Eurofins Built Environment Testing- Portland logoEurofins Built Environment Testing- PortlandTigard, ORC 50How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 64%53+33.7Reliability 28%74+20.9Replies to reviews 8%47+3.9Momentum penalty20−8Experts Score= 50Not enough data for value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade C: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.CB––DC4.59—

What jobs cost

What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.

JobLow25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this.TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this.FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.

Hazardous Material Removal in Oregon at a glance

How the 9 hazardous material removal we rated in Oregon compare, and what customers praise most.

Experts Score grades

A = score 80+, F = below 20.

  • Grade A444%
  • Grade B444%
  • Grade C111%
  • Grade D00%
  • Grade F00%

Google ratings

Average stars per company.

  • 4.90★ and up444%
  • 4.80–4.89★333%
  • 4.60–4.79★111%
  • Below 4.60★111%

What customers praise

Share of Google review highlights.

  • Quality2,63220%
  • Professionalism3,31725%
  • Responsiveness2,81921%
  • Punctuality2,31817%
  • Value2,30217%

Was the price fair?

All price verdicts left with reviews.

  • Great price44149%
  • Reasonable39243%
  • Overpriced212%
  • Not sure556%

Price verdicts by year

Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.

2025
2026

How we grade

Satisfaction (54%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.

Reliability (24%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.

Craft & service (penalty, up to −10) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.

Value (14%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.

Momentum (penalty, up to −10) — Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.

Replies to reviews (7%) — How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.