Experts Reviews · 2026 Ratings

The Best Mold Inspectors in Michigan

We graded 9 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.

—typical jobMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).
99%say the price was fairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.
4.93★average ratingPlain average of every Google star rating we collected for these companies.
1.5%bad jobs (1–2★, 2 yrs)Share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months — or the 20 newest reviews when the company had fewer than 20 in that time.

From 27,409 Google reviews of 77 top-rated mold inspectors nationwide; 9 of them in Michigan. Updated November 3, 2026.

Find the right company for your job

Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.

Best mold inspectors in Michigan for mold inspection

Clear ✕
1Michigan Mold Services logoMichigan Mold Services★ 5.00 on this job7 jobs reviewedHow Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Mold inspection”:Stars on this job 55%5.00★Number of such jobs 25%7Overall Experts Score 20%69Job match= 91Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.93★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.91
2Future Vision Environmental and Consulting, LLC logoFuture Vision Environmental and Consulting, LLC★ 4.33 on this job6 jobs reviewedHow Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Mold inspection”:Stars on this job 55%4.33★Number of such jobs 25%6Overall Experts Score 20%70Job match= 67Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.93★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.67

Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Mold inspection” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.

What customers said about mold inspection

J5 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 3 years ago★★★★★
Future Vision Environmental and Consulting, LLC logoFuture Vision Environmental and C…

Ron and Angel did a fantastic job during their mold inspection of my attic. They made it out to my house right after the holiday weekend and gave me peace of mind. After the attic inspection, Ron even used a vacuum to clean up any extra insulation that had fallen from above. I highly recommend Ron and his team!

Mold inspection+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Professionalism
Tiffany3 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 3 years ago★★★★★
Michigan Mold Services logoMichigan Mold Services

Bill was outstanding in helping us out! Thank you for being our go to Mold Remediation Service!

Mold inspection+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality
James2 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 3 years ago★★★★★
Future Vision Environmental and Consulting, LLC logoFuture Vision Environmental and C…

Ron and his team are FANTASTIC. We had recently bought our home and found mold issues that were not on the Home Inspector's report. Ron and his team came out for testing, set expectations as to what they were going to do, how much everything would cost, timing of work, etc. All very professional and responsive. Ron…

Mold cleaningMold inspection+ Responsiveness
D5 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 years ago★
Future Vision Environmental and Consulting, LLC logoFuture Vision Environmental and C…

Ron promised me a complete home inspection over the phone. I was excited to find them and was very clear as to what I wanted in an inspection and he assured me that he would meet my needs. He did an incomplete inspection, did not listen when I pointed out areas of visible concern, and stopped replying to my…

Mold inspection− Responsiveness− Quality
MeLocal Guide · 13 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 years ago★★★★★
Michigan Mold Services logoMichigan Mold Services

Bill was very kind and professional. Very responsive, on time, answered my questions, very knowledgeable, and dependable. Bill and his team are the people to call if you have a mold concern. I 1000% recommend this company! Thank-you so much Bill!!!

Mold samplingMold inspection+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality
Rick6 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 6 years ago★★★★★
Michigan Mold Services logoMichigan Mold Services

Bill was very responsive each time I called, and handled the job professionally. Very satisfied.

Mold inspectionWater damage-related mold removal+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Professionalism

Overall ratings

Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of mold inspectors).

#CompanyScoreExperts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown.FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (54%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.Reliability (24%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.Craft & service (0%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.Value (14%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.Momentum (0%): Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.Replies to reviews (7%): How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.One letter per factor score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = below 20.★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps.Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews).
124H Mold Inspection of Bloomfield Hills logo24H Mold Inspection of Bloomfield HillsOak Park, MIA 96How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%97+67.2Reliability 31%94+28.9Experts Score= 96Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA––A–4.97—
2Trademark Inspection Services logoTrademark Inspection ServicesOak Park, MIA 95How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%95+51.8Reliability 24%91+22.1Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%100+7.1Craft & service penalty95−0.5Experts Score= 95Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAAA4.95—
3Emes Home Inspections, LLC logoEmes Home Inspections, LLCOak Park, MIA 92How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%94+51.3Reliability 24%87+21.1Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%93+6.6Craft & service penalty88−1.2Experts Score= 92Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAAA4.93—
4Stocks Home Inspection logoStocks Home InspectionOak Park, MIA 84How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%88+51.7Reliability 26%76+19.8Value 15%87+13.2Craft & service penalty97−0.3Experts Score= 84Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.ABAAA–4.83—
5Tri-Tech Testing and Inspection logoTri-Tech Testing and InspectionRoyal Oak, MIA 83How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%86+59.5Reliability 31%75+23.1Experts Score= 83Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AB––––4.82—
6Future Vision Environmental and Consulting, LLC logoFuture Vision Environmental and Consulting, LLCRoyal Oak, MIB 70How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%84+45.8Reliability 24%88+21.3Value 14%23+3.3Replies to reviews 7%48+3.4Craft & service penalty61−3.9Experts Score= 70Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AABDAC4.81—
7Michigan Mold Services logoMichigan Mold ServicesOak Park, MIB 69How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%75+40.9Reliability 24%53+12.8Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%76+5.4Craft & service penalty56−4.4Experts Score= 69Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.BCCAAB4.69—
8Total House Inspection logoTotal House InspectionOak Park, MIB 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%83+45.3Reliability 24%38+9.2Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%86+6.1Craft & service penalty76−2.4Momentum penalty42−5.8Experts Score= 67Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.ADBACA4.88—
9Points North Home Inspections logoPoints North Home InspectionsOak Park, MIB 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%73+39.8Reliability 24%68+16.5Value 14%81+11.5Replies to reviews 7%56+4Craft & service penalty53−4.7Experts Score= 67Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.BBCAAC4.70—

What jobs cost

What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.

JobLow25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this.TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this.FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.

Mold Inspectors in Michigan at a glance

How the 9 mold inspectors we rated in Michigan compare, and what customers praise most.

Experts Score grades

A = score 80+, F = below 20.

  • Grade A556%
  • Grade B444%
  • Grade C00%
  • Grade D00%
  • Grade F00%

Google ratings

Average stars per company.

  • 4.90★ and up333%
  • 4.80–4.89★444%
  • 4.60–4.79★222%
  • Below 4.60★00%

What customers praise

Share of Google review highlights.

  • Quality6,64124%
  • Professionalism7,24526%
  • Responsiveness6,07022%
  • Punctuality3,04311%
  • Value5,08318%

Was the price fair?

All price verdicts left with reviews.

  • Great price68240%
  • Reasonable92355%
  • Overpriced211%
  • Not sure583%

Price verdicts by year

Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.

2025
2026

How we grade

Satisfaction (54%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.

Reliability (24%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.

Craft & service (penalty, up to −10) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.

Value (14%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.

Momentum (penalty, up to −10) — Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.

Replies to reviews (7%) — How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.