The Best Piano Movers in Cedarburg, WI
We graded 3 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.
From 23,777 Google reviews of 49 top-rated piano movers nationwide; 3 of them in Cedarburg, WI. Updated November 2, 2026.
Find the right company for your job
Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.
Best piano movers in Cedarburg for moving-related packing
Clear ✕Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Moving-related packing” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.
What customers said about moving-related packing
Everyone from Luke who quoted our packing prior to our multi-day and truck move to the actual drivers Eddie and Mike who managed the loading and unloading with the entire team were wonderful and professional. They ensured everything was safe, unbroken and furniture placed where it needed to be. They made moving…
Movers were great. The head guy (forgot his name) worked just as hard as the two helpers while directing what needed to be done and when. They worked hard, efficiently, and professionally. They worked well together. The delivery went just as well. Same head guy with one different helper. They worked…
Mr. Mover did an outstanding job with our move. They arrived with a large crew, worked efficiently, and made the entire process go incredibly fast and smooth. The team was professional, organized, and clearly knew what they were doing. I would highly recommend Mr. Mover to anyone looking for a reliable and hardworking moving company. — Gene
I was a difficult customer to deal with due to needing there service during a holiday week on very short notice, not being available to be onsite during the move, and the date of the move was switched 3 or 4 for various reasons. They were nothing but understanding and helpful. They even switched up crews on short…
BEST MOVER EVER - BAR NONE - We have used Mr. Mover at least 10-12 times (no not in witness protection) over a 15 year period - they are simply the best - courteous, good value, hard-working and reliable. If you move locally in MKE or in-state, you are crazy not to give them a shot at your business. And even if…
Great experience with a great local company. Very professional, exceeded expectations. I would recommend Mr. Mover to anyone.
Overall ratings
Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of piano movers).
| # | Company | ScoreExperts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. | FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (54%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.Reliability (24%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.Craft & service (0%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.Value (14%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.Momentum (0%): Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.Replies to reviews (7%): How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.One letter per factor score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = below 20. | ★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps. | Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews). |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A 96How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%99+58.1Reliability 26%96+25Value 15%84+12.8Experts Score= 96Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–AA– | 5.00 | $846 | |
| 2 | A 81How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%82+44.7Reliability 24%78+18.9Value 14%87+12.3Replies to reviews 7%78+5.5Momentum penalty92−0.8Experts Score= 81Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | ABAAAB | 4.78 | $1.4k | |
| 3 | B 79How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%82+56.8Reliability 31%73+22.5Experts Score= 79Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AB––A– | 4.75 | — |
What jobs cost
What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.
| Job | Low25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this. | TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range). | High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this. | FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local moving | $585 | $882 | $1.5k | 98% |
| In-state moving | $738 | $1.3k | $2.5k | 99% |
| Oversized-item moving | $228 | $454 | $933 | 100% |
| Moving-related packing | $403 | $731 | $1.1k | 99% |
| Senior moving | $585 | $834 | $1.4k | 100% |
| Interstate moving | $2.1k | $3.2k | $4.9k | 97% |
| Small furniture moving | $114 | $397 | $731 | 99% |
| Moving-related storage | $351 | $585 | $1.1k | 99% |
| Business & corporate-related moving | $351 | $958 | $1.5k | 100% |
Piano Movers in Cedarburg, WI at a glance
How the 3 piano movers we rated in Cedarburg, WI compare, and what customers praise most.
Experts Score grades
A = score 80+, F = below 20.
- Grade A267%
- Grade B133%
- Grade C00%
- Grade D00%
- Grade F00%
Google ratings
Average stars per company.
- 4.90★ and up133%
- 4.80–4.89★00%
- 4.60–4.79★267%
- Below 4.60★00%
What customers praise
Share of Google review highlights.
- Quality4,11724%
- Professionalism4,70027%
- Responsiveness3,85722%
- Punctuality1,3378%
- Value3,49820%
Was the price fair?
All price verdicts left with reviews.
- Great price1,59445%
- Reasonable1,79750%
- Overpriced712%
- Not sure1143%
Price verdicts by year
Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.
How we grade
Satisfaction (54%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.
Reliability (24%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.
Craft & service (penalty, up to −10) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.
Value (14%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.
Momentum (penalty, up to −10) — Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.
Replies to reviews (7%) — How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.