The Best Septic Tank Services in Eagan, MN
We graded 8 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.
From 31,989 Google reviews of 75 top-rated septic tank services nationwide; 8 of them in Eagan, MN. Updated November 3, 2026.
Find the right company for your job
Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.
Best septic tank services in Eagan for shower repair
Clear ✕Not enough reviews tagged “Shower repair” in this city to rank companies yet.
Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Shower repair” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.
What customers said about shower repair
Fabulous service, same day service, fixed 3 plumbing issues quickly. Clean and reliable people. The fee was very, very fair, we would use them in a heart beat again. Daryl
Do Right plumbing came to my rescue on a freezing cold February day. My Propane tank had a faulty component resulting in no fuel source to my furnace. Significant damage was done to my home due to sustaining 3 weeks of no heat. DoRight not only found and corrected all the defective plumbing problems but acted as a…
We are new home owners and we needed to fix our tub spout. I did some online looking at plumbers in the area and called Hopke. They fit us into their schedule within 36 hours. Greg worked on our issue and was prompt, knowledgeable, and professional. He gave us expert advice and answered all of my questions which I…
Chris & Angie installed a new shower faucet handle and faucet head in our bathroom, replacing our original one from 1940. It was an extensive job and Chris had to drill multiple holes through the wall, access panel & original wood studs in order to create the new shower line. They got it sealed up and running…
Pedro was amazing! He communicated the problem well and found the most efficient solution for our leaky pipe that caused water damage in the floor below. At every stage he communicated his findings and gave us options for solutions. He is the only person we will trust with our plumbing needs!
Overall ratings
Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of septic tank services).
| # | Company | ScoreExperts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. | FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (54%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.Reliability (24%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.Craft & service (0%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.Value (14%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.Momentum (0%): Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.Replies to reviews (7%): How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.One letter per factor score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = below 20. | ★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps. | Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews). |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A 92How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%91+53.4Reliability 26%89+23.2Value 15%100+15.2Craft & service penalty99−0.1Experts Score= 92Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AAAAA– | 4.88 | — | |
| 2 | A 89How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%89+48.5Reliability 24%85+20.6Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%84+5.9Craft & service penalty99−0.1Experts Score= 89Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AAAAAA | 4.93 | $554 | |
| 3 | A 89How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%91+53.4Reliability 26%88+23Value 15%85+12.9Experts Score= 89Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–AA– | 4.85 | — | |
| 4 | A 85How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%87+47.5Reliability 24%85+20.6Value 14%96+13.6Replies to reviews 7%89+6.3Craft & service penalty66−3.4Experts Score= 85Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AABAAA | 4.78 | $490 | |
| 5 | A 81How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%84+58.2Reliability 31%73+22.5Experts Score= 81Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AB––A– | 4.77 | — | |
| 6 | B 78How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%86+46.9Reliability 24%75+18.2Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%47+3.3Craft & service penalty51−4.9Experts Score= 78Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | ABCAAC | 4.72 | $274 | |
| 7 | B 67How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%75+40.9Reliability 24%70+17Value 14%67+9.5Replies to reviews 7%79+5.6Craft & service penalty50−5Momentum penalty93−0.7Experts Score= 67Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BBCBAB | 4.72 | — | |
| 8 | B 62How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%72+39.3Reliability 24%69+16.7Value 14%55+7.8Replies to reviews 7%100+7.1Craft & service penalty7−9.3Experts Score= 62Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BBFC–A | 4.53 | — |
What jobs cost
What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.
| Job | Low25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this. | TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range). | High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this. | FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drain cleaning | $227 | $317 | $453 | 97% |
| Plumbing pipe repair | $305 | $498 | $1.2k | 97% |
| Toilet repair | $205 | $328 | $593 | 96% |
| Plumbing leak detection | $57 | $228 | $495 | 95% |
| Sewer cleaning | $271 | $366 | $529 | 98% |
| Water heater installation | $1.2k | $1.9k | $2.4k | 97% |
| Plumbing leak repair | $248 | $406 | $1.1k | 96% |
| Faucet repair | $271 | $399 | $659 | 97% |
| Sewer repair | $393 | $1.2k | $2.1k | 98% |
| Faucet installation | $292 | $486 | $786 | 93% |
| Outdoor plumbing system repair | $322 | $502 | $998 | 98% |
| Shower repair | $148 | $322 | $478 | 98% |
Septic Tank Services in Eagan, MN at a glance
How the 8 septic tank services we rated in Eagan, MN compare, and what customers praise most.
Experts Score grades
A = score 80+, F = below 20.
- Grade A563%
- Grade B338%
- Grade C00%
- Grade D00%
- Grade F00%
Google ratings
Average stars per company.
- 4.90★ and up113%
- 4.80–4.89★225%
- 4.60–4.79★450%
- Below 4.60★113%
What customers praise
Share of Google review highlights.
- Quality6,08820%
- Professionalism7,09524%
- Responsiveness6,38921%
- Punctuality5,81219%
- Value4,42815%
Was the price fair?
All price verdicts left with reviews.
- Great price1,37128%
- Reasonable3,07862%
- Overpriced1754%
- Not sure3617%
Price verdicts by year
Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.
How we grade
Satisfaction (54%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.
Reliability (24%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.
Craft & service (penalty, up to −10) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.
Value (14%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.
Momentum (penalty, up to −10) — Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.
Replies to reviews (7%) — How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.