The Best Tree Services
We graded 26 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.
From 3,784 Google reviews of 26 top-rated tree services nationwide. Updated October 25, 2026.
Find the right company for your job
Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.
Best tree services for lawn mowing & maintenance
Clear ✕Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Lawn mowing & maintenance” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.
What customers said about lawn mowing & maintenance
Wizard Lawn has taken care of my lawn for going on 4 four years. They do a great job and are always dependable.
They did an amazing job! Our backyard is full of well kept gardens so it’s wonderful that our grass matches them! Highly recommend!
Big shout out to Wizard Lawn Service. A family business that has been providing me with dependable lawn mowing and on demand extra services for the past 3 years. Wayne and his son privide friendly reliable services for a reasonable price. A local Elk River business worth supporting. Check them out.
Wayne is the real deal, very prompt in coming out and giving an estimate. His team and him did a wonderful job with the leaf removal and also were very fast. Very knowledgeable. Will use Wizard again.
We have used Wizard Lawn Services for fall leaf cleanup twice now, both times having a great experience. We try our best to use local businesses/services and would recommend Wayne and his team. He is responsive, kind and passionate about his work! His service is above and beyond what we could do ourselves.
These guys did a great job on our lawn and will be useing them in the future for our yard needs. Highly recommend good group on guys to work with.
Overall ratings
Experts Score 0–100 and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of tree services).
| # | Company | Grade | Satis · Relia · Craft · Value · Momen · Track · Accou | ★ | Typical bill |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A 85 | AA–ACCC | 5.00 | — | |
| 2 | B 79 | AA–ACDC | 5.00 | — | |
| 3 | B 79 | AA–BCDC | 5.00 | — | |
| 4 | B 71 | AA–BCFC | 5.00 | — | |
| 5 | B 70 | AB–ACFC | 5.00 | — | |
| 6 | B 65 | CAACAAF | 4.84 | — | |
| 7 | C 58 | BB–FBFC | 4.98 | — | |
| 8 | C 58 | BBFDBAA | 4.94 | — | |
| 9 | C 54 | DCBFAAB | 4.78 | — | |
| 10 | C 53 | CBCCBDA | 4.93 | — | |
| 11 | C 53 | BBDDCBC | 5.00 | — | |
| 12 | C 52 | BC–BDCF | 4.97 | — |
What jobs cost
What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.
| Job | Low | Typical | High | Fair |
|---|
Was the price fair?
All price verdicts left with reviews.
Price verdicts by year
Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.
How we grade
Satisfaction (35%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.
Reliability (15%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).
Craft & service (20%) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.
Value (10%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.
Momentum (8%) — Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.
Track record (7%) — Review volume and years with reviews.
Accountability (5%) — Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.