PLUMBERS · DALLAS, TX
Cody & Sons Plumbing, Heating & Air logoHow the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%44+15.4Reliability 15%54+8.1Craft & service 20%65+13Value 10%51+5.1Momentum 8%89+7.1Track record 7%94+6.6Accountability 5%95+4.8Experts Score= 60Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.60SCORE

Cody & Sons Plumbing, Heating & Air

Better than 68% of plumbers · #29 of 90

4.9★2,416 Google reviewsGoogle star rating as shown on Google Maps.
4.93★last 12 monthsAverage stars on reviews from the last 12 months only.
1.7%1–2★ in 2 yrs (avg 2.6%)Share of reviews from the last 24 months that gave 1 or 2 stars.
99%complaints answeredShare of 1–3★ reviews the owner publicly replied to.

Cody & Sons Plumbing, Heating & Air for a/c system vent cleaning

Clear ✕
Jobs reviewedHow many Google reviews are tagged with this job.1
★ on this jobAverage stars on the reviews where the customer tagged this exact job (Google’s “Services” field).5.00
Usually paidThe price range customers picked most often for this job.—

All 1 Google reviews tagged “A/C system vent cleaning”

Jodi7 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 4 years ago★★★★★

Great service - 5 stars from us on the AC maintenance package.

A/C system maintenanceA/C system vent cleaning+ Responsiveness+ Punctuality+ Quality

vs category

Blue = Cody, grey = plumbers average

SatisfactionReliabilityCraftValueMomentumTrackAccountability
This companyCategory average

Rating over time

4.04.55.02024-Q1: 4.89★ (112 reviews)2024-Q2: 4.93★ (68 reviews)2024-Q3: 4.91★ (97 reviews)2024-Q4: 4.73★ (83 reviews)2025-Q1: 4.86★ (66 reviews)2025-Q2: 4.90★ (98 reviews)2025-Q3: 4.91★ (87 reviews)2025-Q4: 4.84★ (75 reviews)2026-Q1: 4.99★ (112 reviews)2026-Q2: 4.93★ (109 reviews)2026-Q3: 4.93★ (135 reviews)2026-Q4: 5.00★ (36 reviews)2024-Q12024-Q42025-Q32026-Q22026-Q4
This companyIndustrydot size = review count

Price

$410-14% vs typical plumbers

Bar = middle half of what customers paid · gold mark = category median.

Great price 24%Reasonable 67%Overpriced 3%Not sure 6%

Score factorsHow the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%44+15.4Reliability 15%54+8.1Craft & service 20%65+13Value 10%51+5.1Momentum 8%89+7.1Track record 7%94+6.6Accountability 5%95+4.8Experts Score= 60Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.

SatisfactionSatisfaction · 35%Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.Bar = this company’s percentile, tick = category average.
44
ReliabilityReliability · 15%How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).Bar = this company’s percentile, tick = category average.
54
Craft & serviceCraft & service · 20%Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.Bar = this company’s percentile, tick = category average.
65
ValueValue · 10%Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.Bar = this company’s percentile, tick = category average.
51
MomentumMomentum · 8%Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.Bar = this company’s percentile, tick = category average.
89
Track recordTrack record · 7%Review volume and years with reviews.Bar = this company’s percentile, tick = category average.
94
AccountabilityAccountability · 5%Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.Bar = this company’s percentile, tick = category average.
95

Praised for

Google highlights · percentile vs peersGoogle review highlights (Quality, Professionalism…): positive minus negative mentions per review, as a percentile vs peers.

Quality
+586 / −4
Professionalism
+670 / −9
Responsiveness
+585 / −8
Punctuality
+560 / −3
Value
+427 / −11

Compare with