Experts Reviews · Company report
Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling logoHow the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%81+44.2Reliability 24%66+16Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%34+2.4Craft & service penalty96−0.4Momentum penalty51−4.9Experts Score= 71Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.71SCORE

Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling

San Francisco, CA · Grade BLetter from the Experts Score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = under 20. · #12Position by Experts Score among all companies we track in this category. of 14 sump pump repair services · 4.9★ from 1,935 Google reviews

Report card

Percentile vs other sump pump repair services (100 = best)Each factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (star average, share of 1–2★ reviews, price verdicts…); standing within the category can only raise it, never lower it.. Strongest: value and craft & service; weakest: replies to reviews.

SatisfactionSatisfaction · 54% of the scoreRecency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling is better than 81% of sump pump repair services.A
81
ReliabilityReliability · 24% of the scoreHow rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling is better than 66% of sump pump repair services.B
66
Craft & serviceCraft & service · 0% of the scoreGoogle review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling is better than 96% of sump pump repair services.A
96
ValueValue · 14% of the scoreCustomers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling is better than 100% of sump pump repair services.A
100
MomentumMomentum · 0% of the scorePenalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling is better than 51% of sump pump repair services.C
51
Replies to reviewsReplies to reviews · 7% of the scoreHow often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling is better than 34% of sump pump repair services.D
34

Reviews for your job

Customers hired Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling for 8 kinds of job.

Magic Plumbing Heating & Cooling for heating system repair

Clear ✕
Jobs reviewedHow many Google reviews are tagged with this job.3
★ on this jobAverage stars on the reviews where the customer tagged this exact job (Google’s “Services” field).5.00
Usually paidThe price range customers picked most often for this job.$200–300
Rank for this jobPosition of this company in the Job match ranking for this job among the companies we track.Its Job match: 75/100.How Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Heating system repair”:Stars on this job 55%Number of such jobs 25%Overall Experts Score 20%Stars are pulled toward the category average when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.#3 / 3
Said fairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.100%

All 3 Google reviews tagged “Heating system repair”

Dave4 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 10 months ago★★★★★

They did a good job getting my furnace working. Very satisfied.

Paid $200–300Reasonable priceHeating system repair
BARBARALocal Guide · 32 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · Edited a year ago★★★★★

During the coldest summer in over 100 years, my newly installed 3 year old forced air furnace quit. I'm writing About Magic Plumbing Heating though, so won't name the company that installed the system. I called them and both the tech and the owner expressed that the job was not done correctly and they'd charge over…

Paid $1,000+Reasonable priceHeating system repair
Suzanne10 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 2 years ago★★★★★

Thorough and thoughtful. Takes time to explain what is right and where things can be improved for efficiency and safety.

Heating system repairWater tank repair+ Quality

Price

$767+60% vs typical sump pump repair services

Bar = middle half of what customers paid · gold mark = category median.

Price verdictsGoogle asks reviewers whether the price was great, reasonable or overpriced; these are their answers.

Great price 17%Reasonable 55%Overpriced 12%Not sure 17%

Jobs customers hired them for

JobReviewsCategory typical
Drain cleaning269$248–$506
Toilet repair152$251–$611
Plumbing leak detection123$216–$559
Plumbing pipe repair113$269–$1.4k
Water heater installation84$1.4k–$2.8k
Faucet repair74$264–$782
Plumbing leak repair50$239–$618
Water heater repair44$264–$796

Compare with