Window Cleaning Services · Springfield, IL

Is Pamela's Cleaning Service, LLC any good?

Our verdict: mixed — #32 of 38 window cleaning services, better than 16%. Customers single out its momentum and reliability; value is where it trails.

👍 Strengths

Momentum — better than 91% of peers

Reliability — better than 75% of peers

Accountability — better than 72% of peers

👎 Watch-outs

Track record — 14th percentile

Craft & service — 8th percentile

Value — 7th percentile

Need a specific job done? See what customers paid and said about it here.

Pamela's Cleaning Service, LLC for general housekeeping

Clear ✕

6 customers reviewed a general housekeeping job here and rated it 5.00★. Most paid $100–150. For this job it ranks #3 of 3 window cleaning services we track.

★★★★★ Kyle · 5 months ago

Great cleaner. Her price is fair, she communicates well, and she leaves my house nice and clean!

Paid $100–150Great priceStandard cleaningGeneral housekeeping
★★★★★ David · 10 months ago

Excellent cleaners and customer service. Going above and beyond expectations each time they have cleaned! Much better than any other service I have used.

Paid $150–200Reasonable priceGeneral housekeepingDeep clean

Price

$$$$
$149-21% vs typical window cleaning services

Bar = middle half of what customers paid · gold mark = category median.

Questions about Pamela's Cleaning Service, LLC

Is Pamela's Cleaning Service, LLC good?

Yes by most measures: 4.9★ from 67 Google reviews and an Experts Score of 34/100 (grade D), #32 of 38 window cleaning services we track. 0% of reviews in the last two years were 1–2★ (category average 1.2%).

How much does Pamela's Cleaning Service, LLC charge?

Customers reported a typical bill of $149 (middle half $119–$183), 21% below the window cleaning services median of $189.

What do customers hire Pamela's Cleaning Service, LLC for?

Mostly standard cleaning (19), general housekeeping (6), deep clean (4).

Does the owner respond to complaints?

The owner replied to 100% of 1–3★ reviews (category: 54%).

Compare with