Experts Reviews · 2026 Ratings
The Best Property Management Companies
We graded 41 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.
—typical jobMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).
0%say the price was fairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.
4.75★average ratingPlain average of every Google star rating we collected for these companies.
5.4%bad jobs (1–2★, 2 yrs)Share of reviews from the last 24 months that gave 1 or 2 stars.
From 13,928 Google reviews of 41 top-rated property management companies nationwide. Updated October 25, 2026.
Find the right company for your job
Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.
Best property management companies for lawn mowing & maintenance
Clear ✕1
DEPENDABLE LAWN CARE & PROPERTY SERVICESHow Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Lawn mowing & maintenance”:Stars on this job 55%5.00★Number of such jobs 25%3Overall Experts Score 20%66Job match= 79Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.75★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.79
DEPENDABLE LAWN CARE & PROPERTY SERVICESHow Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Lawn mowing & maintenance”:Stars on this job 55%5.00★Number of such jobs 25%3Overall Experts Score 20%66Job match= 79Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.75★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.79Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Lawn mowing & maintenance” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.
What customers said about lawn mowing & maintenance
DebraLocal Guide · 20 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 5 years ago★★★★★
DEPENDABLE LAWN CARE & PROPERTY S…I have use dependable lawn care for three years now at my cottage they are professional, dependable and pay attention to detail I highly recommend them I will continue to use them as long as the want the job!
Lawn mowing & maintenanceYard work+ Quality+ Professionalism+ Value
Overall ratings
Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Weighted average of 7 percentiles vs other companies in the category: satisfaction 35%, workmanship 20%, reliability 15%, value 10%, momentum 8%, track record 7%, owner replies 5%. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of property management companies).
| # | Company | ScoreExperts Score (0–100)Weighted average of 7 percentiles vs other companies in the category: satisfaction 35%, workmanship 20%, reliability 15%, value 10%, momentum 8%, track record 7%, owner replies 5%. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. | FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (35%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.Reliability (15%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).Craft & service (20%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.Value (10%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.Momentum (8%): Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.Track record (7%): Review volume and years with reviews.Accountability (5%): Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.One letter per factor, by percentile among peers: A = top 20%, B = next 20%, and so on. | ★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps. | Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews). |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  The SELLING Team with Keller Williams RealtyLansing, MI | A 90How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%99+34.7Reliability 15%99+14.9Craft & service 20%98+19.6Value 10%98+9.8Momentum 8%41+3.3Track record 7%79+5.5Accountability 5%45+2.3Experts Score= 90Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AAAACBC | 5.00 | — |
| 2 |  Good Neighbor Property ManagementAustin, TX | A 85How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%96+48Reliability 21%96+20.6Momentum 11%71+8.1Track record 10%33+3.3Accountability 7%74+5.3Experts Score= 85Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA––BDB | 4.99 | — |
| 3 |  Americana Property Management by Century 21North Las Vegas, NV | B 79How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%87+30.5Reliability 15%91+13.7Craft & service 20%80+16Value 10%93+9.3Momentum 8%58+4.6Track record 7%52+3.6Accountability 5%27+1.4Experts Score= 79Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AAAACCD | 4.95 | — |
| 4 |  5 Star STR / Short Term / Vacation Rental ManagementNorth Las Vegas, NV | B 77How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%91+45.5Reliability 21%89+19.1Momentum 11%58+6.6Track record 10%30+3Accountability 7%45+3.2Experts Score= 77Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA––CDC | 5.00 | — |
| 5 |  Via Luxury Rentals & Property ManagementAustin, TX | B 74How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%89+44.5Reliability 21%87+18.6Momentum 11%58+6.6Track record 10%11+1.1Accountability 7%45+3.2Experts Score= 74Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA––CFC | 5.00 | — |
| 6 |  Wade’s Property Services, LLCEast Moline, IL | B 73How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%94+41.1Reliability 19%94+17.6Value 13%38+4.8Momentum 10%46+4.6Track record 9%21+1.8Accountability 6%45+2.8Experts Score= 73Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–DCDC | 4.99 | — |
| 7 |  Sin City Real Estate and Management LLCNorth Las Vegas, NV | B 70How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%84+42Reliability 21%79+16.9Momentum 11%58+6.6Track record 10%16+1.6Accountability 7%45+3.2Experts Score= 70Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AB––CFC | 5.00 | — |
| 8 |  Eric the Realtor / Century 21 NorthlandAlpena, MI | B 69How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%77+38.5Reliability 21%82+17.6Momentum 11%74+8.5Track record 10%13+1.3Accountability 7%45+3.2Experts Score= 69Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BA––BFC | 4.98 | — |
| 9 |  Five Star Vacation Home Rentals | Luxury Airbnb/STR Management | Austin, TXAustin, TX | B 69How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%82+41Reliability 21%65+13.9Momentum 11%29+3.3Track record 10%50+5Accountability 7%80+5.7Experts Score= 69Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AB––DCA | 4.96 | — |
| 10 |  Martin Commercial PropertiesLansing, MI | B 66How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%65+32.5Reliability 21%67+14.4Momentum 11%84+9.6Track record 10%40+4Accountability 7%74+5.3Experts Score= 66Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BB––ACB | 4.89 | — |
| 11 | DEPENDABLE LAWN CARE & PROPERTY SERVICESAlpena, MI | B 66How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%55+19.3Reliability 15%52+7.8Craft & service 20%89+17.8Value 10%71+7.1Momentum 8%81+6.5Track record 7%48+3.4Accountability 5%80+4Experts Score= 66Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | CCABACA | 4.90 | — |
| 12 |  Rice Real Estate & Property ManagementNorth Las Vegas, NV | B 65How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 39%67+26.1Reliability 17%60+10Craft & service 22%59+13.1Momentum 9%76+6.8Track record 8%65+5.1Accountability 6%74+4.1Experts Score= 65Not enough data for value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BBC–BBB | 4.95 | — |
What jobs cost
What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.
| Job | Low25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this. | TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range). | High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this. | FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”. |
|---|
Was the price fair?
All price verdicts left with reviews.
Great price · 0%
Reasonable · 0%
Overpriced · 0%
Not sure · 0%
Price verdicts by year
Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.
How we grade
Satisfaction (35%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.
Reliability (15%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).
Craft & service (20%) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.
Value (10%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.
Momentum (8%) — Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.
Track record (7%) — Review volume and years with reviews.
Accountability (5%) — Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.