Experts Reviews · 2026 Ratings
The Best Property Management Companies
We graded 41 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.
—typical jobMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).
0%say the price was fairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.
4.75★average ratingPlain average of every Google star rating we collected for these companies.
5.4%bad jobs (1–2★, 2 yrs)Share of reviews from the last 24 months that gave 1 or 2 stars.
From 13,928 Google reviews of 41 top-rated property management companies nationwide. Updated October 25, 2026.
Find the right company for your job
Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.
Best property management companies for motorcycle insurance
Clear ✕1
Alpena Agency, Inc.How Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Motorcycle insurance”:Stars on this job 55%5.00★Number of such jobs 25%3Overall Experts Score 20%42Job match= 74Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.75★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.74
Alpena Agency, Inc.How Job match is calculatedBuilt only from reviews Google tagged “Motorcycle insurance”:Stars on this job 55%5.00★Number of such jobs 25%3Overall Experts Score 20%42Job match= 74Stars are pulled toward the category average (4.75★) when a company has few tagged jobs, so 3 perfect reviews don’t beat 80 great ones. 4.3★ scores 0, 5.0★ scores full. Volume is compared with the busiest company for this job.74Job match = this company’s ★ on reviews Google tagged “Motorcycle insurance” (shrunk toward the category average when there are few), how many such jobs it has done, and its overall Experts Score.
What customers said about motorcycle insurance
CarrieLocal Guide · 178 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 3 months ago★★★★★Alpena Agency, Inc.Great insurance company... covers all our lives! car, house for a great price. Wouldn't go anywhere else.
Great priceMotorcycle insuranceProperty insuranceVehicle insurance
Trevor2 reviewsTotal number of Google reviews this person has written across all businesses on Google Maps (not just this one). More reviews usually means a more experienced, trustworthy reviewer. · 5 months ago★★★★★Alpena Agency, Inc.Lynette was absolutely the best to help me out and got it done extremely fast, I would highly recommend her and this agency
Motorcycle insurance
Overall ratings
Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Weighted average of 7 percentiles vs other companies in the category: satisfaction 35%, workmanship 20%, reliability 15%, value 10%, momentum 8%, track record 7%, owner replies 5%. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of property management companies).
| # | Company | ScoreExperts Score (0–100)Weighted average of 7 percentiles vs other companies in the category: satisfaction 35%, workmanship 20%, reliability 15%, value 10%, momentum 8%, track record 7%, owner replies 5%. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. | FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (35%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.Reliability (15%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).Craft & service (20%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.Value (10%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.Momentum (8%): Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.Track record (7%): Review volume and years with reviews.Accountability (5%): Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.One letter per factor, by percentile among peers: A = top 20%, B = next 20%, and so on. | ★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps. | Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews). |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  The SELLING Team with Keller Williams RealtyLansing, MI | A 90How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%99+34.7Reliability 15%99+14.9Craft & service 20%98+19.6Value 10%98+9.8Momentum 8%41+3.3Track record 7%79+5.5Accountability 5%45+2.3Experts Score= 90Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AAAACBC | 5.00 | — |
| 2 |  Good Neighbor Property ManagementAustin, TX | A 85How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%96+48Reliability 21%96+20.6Momentum 11%71+8.1Track record 10%33+3.3Accountability 7%74+5.3Experts Score= 85Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA––BDB | 4.99 | — |
| 3 |  Americana Property Management by Century 21North Las Vegas, NV | B 79How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%87+30.5Reliability 15%91+13.7Craft & service 20%80+16Value 10%93+9.3Momentum 8%58+4.6Track record 7%52+3.6Accountability 5%27+1.4Experts Score= 79Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AAAACCD | 4.95 | — |
| 4 |  5 Star STR / Short Term / Vacation Rental ManagementNorth Las Vegas, NV | B 77How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%91+45.5Reliability 21%89+19.1Momentum 11%58+6.6Track record 10%30+3Accountability 7%45+3.2Experts Score= 77Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA––CDC | 5.00 | — |
| 5 |  Via Luxury Rentals & Property ManagementAustin, TX | B 74How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%89+44.5Reliability 21%87+18.6Momentum 11%58+6.6Track record 10%11+1.1Accountability 7%45+3.2Experts Score= 74Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA––CFC | 5.00 | — |
| 6 |  Wade’s Property Services, LLCEast Moline, IL | B 73How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 44%94+41.1Reliability 19%94+17.6Value 13%38+4.8Momentum 10%46+4.6Track record 9%21+1.8Accountability 6%45+2.8Experts Score= 73Not enough data for craft & service; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AA–DCDC | 4.99 | — |
| 7 |  Sin City Real Estate and Management LLCNorth Las Vegas, NV | B 70How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%84+42Reliability 21%79+16.9Momentum 11%58+6.6Track record 10%16+1.6Accountability 7%45+3.2Experts Score= 70Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AB––CFC | 5.00 | — |
| 8 |  Eric the Realtor / Century 21 NorthlandAlpena, MI | B 69How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%77+38.5Reliability 21%82+17.6Momentum 11%74+8.5Track record 10%13+1.3Accountability 7%45+3.2Experts Score= 69Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BA––BFC | 4.98 | — |
| 9 |  Five Star Vacation Home Rentals | Luxury Airbnb/STR Management | Austin, TXAustin, TX | B 69How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%82+41Reliability 21%65+13.9Momentum 11%29+3.3Track record 10%50+5Accountability 7%80+5.7Experts Score= 69Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | AB––DCA | 4.96 | — |
| 10 |  Martin Commercial PropertiesLansing, MI | B 66How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 50%65+32.5Reliability 21%67+14.4Momentum 11%84+9.6Track record 10%40+4Accountability 7%74+5.3Experts Score= 66Not enough data for craft & service, value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BB––ACB | 4.89 | — |
| 11 |  DEPENDABLE LAWN CARE & PROPERTY SERVICESAlpena, MI | B 66How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 35%55+19.3Reliability 15%52+7.8Craft & service 20%89+17.8Value 10%71+7.1Momentum 8%81+6.5Track record 7%48+3.4Accountability 5%80+4Experts Score= 66Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | CCABACA | 4.90 | — |
| 12 |  Rice Real Estate & Property ManagementNorth Las Vegas, NV | B 65How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is a percentile (0–100) against the other companies in this category, then weighted:Satisfaction 39%67+26.1Reliability 17%60+10Craft & service 22%59+13.1Momentum 9%76+6.8Track record 8%65+5.1Accountability 6%74+4.1Experts Score= 65Not enough data for value; its weight is shared by the others.Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews. | BBC–BBB | 4.95 | — |
What jobs cost
What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.
| Job | Low25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this. | TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range). | High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this. | FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”. |
|---|
Was the price fair?
All price verdicts left with reviews.
Great price · 0%
Reasonable · 0%
Overpriced · 0%
Not sure · 0%
Price verdicts by year
Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.
How we grade
Satisfaction (35%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume.
Reliability (15%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months (fewer = better).
Craft & service (20%) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — net praise per review.
Value (10%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights.
Momentum (8%) — Last 12 months vs lifetime average — improving or slipping.
Track record (7%) — Review volume and years with reviews.
Accountability (5%) — Owner replies to 1–3★ reviews.