Experts Reviews · 2026 Ratings

The Best Civil Litigation Lawyers in Draper, UT

We graded 10 companies on seven things customers actually report: satisfaction, reliability, workmanship, value, momentum, track record and how owners handle complaints.

—typical jobMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).
0%say the price was fairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.
4.84★average ratingPlain average of every Google star rating we collected for these companies.
3.1%bad jobs (1–2★, 2 yrs)Share of 1–2★ reviews in the last 24 months — or the 20 newest reviews when the company had fewer than 20 in that time.

From 24,240 Google reviews of 110 top-rated civil litigation lawyers nationwide; 10 of them in Draper, UT. Updated November 11, 2026.

Find the right company for your job

Pick the job — we re-rank companies by how customers rated that exact job.

Overall ratings

Experts Score 0–100Experts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown. and a letter grade per factor (A = top 20% of civil litigation lawyers).

#CompanyScoreExperts Score (0–100)Absolute quality first: recency-weighted star average (≈54%), share of 1–2★ reviews (≈24%), customers’ price verdicts (≈14%), owner replies to critical reviews (≈7%); minus up to 10 points each for complaints flagged in Google review highlights and for a real slide in recent ratings. Hover a company’s score on its page for the full breakdown.FactorsFactor grades, in orderSatisfaction (54%): Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.Reliability (24%): How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.Craft & service (0%): Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.Value (14%): Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.Momentum (0%): Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.Replies to reviews (7%): How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.One letter per factor score: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39, F = below 20.★Google star rating as shown on Google Maps.Typical billMedian bill customers of this company reported in their reviews (needs 3+ priced reviews).
1Stephanie Pitcher Law logoStephanie Pitcher LawDraper, UTA 99How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 69%100+69.2Reliability 31%98+30.2Experts Score= 99Not enough data for value, replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AA––A–5.00—
2Legacy Peak Estate Planning by Cutler | Riley logoLegacy Peak Estate Planning by Cutler | RileyDraper, UTA 98How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%98+53.5Reliability 24%96+23.3Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%100+7.1Experts Score= 98Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAAA4.98—
3Randall Sparks logoRandall SparksDraper, UTA 98How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%99+58.1Reliability 26%96+25Value 15%99+15.1Craft & service penalty99−0.1Experts Score= 98Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAA–4.99—
4Marianne Ludlow, Esq. logoMarianne Ludlow, Esq.Draper, UTA 93How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%94+51.3Reliability 24%91+22.1Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%85+6Experts Score= 93Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAAA4.96—
5Craig Swapp & Associates logoCraig Swapp & AssociatesDraper, UTA 93How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%92+50.2Reliability 24%90+21.8Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%96+6.8Craft & service penalty97−0.3Experts Score= 93Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAAA4.90—
6Evershed Law, PLLC logoEvershed Law, PLLCDraper, UTA 91How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 59%94+55.2Reliability 26%83+21.7Value 15%95+14.5Craft & service penalty99−0.1Experts Score= 91Not enough data for replies to reviews; its weight is shared by the others.Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAA–4.95—
7LifeLaw Trial Lawyers logoLifeLaw Trial LawyersDraper, UTA 90How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%93+50.7Reliability 24%91+22.1Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%48+3.4Experts Score= 90Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAAC4.92—
8Dean Smith, Attorney logoDean Smith, AttorneyDraper, UTA 87How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%93+50.7Reliability 24%90+21.8Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%23+1.6Craft & service penalty87−1.3Experts Score= 87Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.AAAAAD4.89—
9Employer-Lawyer, PLLC logoEmployer-Lawyer, PLLCDraper, UTA 80How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%83+45.3Reliability 24%71+17.2Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%85+6Momentum penalty76−2.4Experts Score= 80Grade A: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.ABAABA4.89—
10Trujillo Law Group logoTrujillo Law GroupDraper, UTB 78How the Experts Score is calculatedEach factor is scored 0–100 on absolute terms (standing in the category can only raise it), then weighted; problems flagged in review highlights or a recent slide in ratings are subtracted:Satisfaction 55%84+45.8Reliability 24%71+17.2Value 14%100+14.1Replies to reviews 7%49+3.5Craft & service penalty89−1.1Momentum penalty89−1.1Experts Score= 78Grade B: A = 80+, B = 60–79, C = 40–59, D = 20–39. Needs 10+ reviews.ABAAAC4.82—

What jobs cost

What customers paid, from the price Google asks reviewers to report.

JobLow25th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid less than this.TypicalMedian of the bill customers reported in their Google review (Google asks reviewers for a price range; we use the middle of each range).High75th percentile: 1 in 4 customers paid more than this.FairOf customers who rated the price, the share who chose “Great price” or “Reasonable” rather than “Overpriced”.

Civil Litigation Lawyers in Draper, UT at a glance

How the 10 civil litigation lawyers we rated in Draper, UT compare, and what customers praise most.

Experts Score grades

A = score 80+, F = below 20.

  • Grade A990%
  • Grade B110%
  • Grade C00%
  • Grade D00%
  • Grade F00%

Google ratings

Average stars per company.

  • 4.90★ and up770%
  • 4.80–4.89★330%
  • 4.60–4.79★00%
  • Below 4.60★00%

What customers praise

Share of Google review highlights.

  • Quality1,54423%
  • Professionalism2,13132%
  • Responsiveness1,80227%
  • Punctuality00%
  • Value1,28219%

Was the price fair?

All price verdicts left with reviews.

Not enough data yet.

Price verdicts by year

Share calling it great / reasonable / overpriced.

How we grade

Satisfaction (54%) — Recency-weighted star average (2-year half-life), shrunk toward the category mean by review volume; the company’s own lifetime average as the prior; absolute: 4.0★ = 0, 5★ = 100.

Reliability (24%) — How rarely jobs go badly: share of 1–2★ reviews — 60% the last 24 months (or the 20 newest if fewer), 40% all-time; 0% = 100, 15%+ = 0; the category percentile can only raise it.

Craft & service (penalty, up to −10) — Google review highlights: Quality, Professionalism, Responsiveness, Punctuality — how rarely reviewers flag them as a negative, per review since highlights began; 0% = 100, 5%+ = 0. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in — clean highlights are the norm, not a bonus.

Value (14%) — Customers’ own price verdicts (Great / Reasonable vs Overpriced) and Value highlights; 65% absolute (all “reasonable” ≈ 80, “great” = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.

Momentum (penalty, up to −10) — Penalises only a real slide: last-12-month average below lifetime (−0.5★ = 0). Still 4.8★+ over the last year, or steady/improving = 100. Subtracted from the score (up to −10), never averaged in.

Replies to reviews (7%) — How often the owner publicly replies to reviews under 5★ (1–4★). Needs 3+ such reviews, otherwise not counted; 65% absolute (80%+ replied = 100), the category percentile can only raise it.

The 10 best-rated civil litigation lawyers in Draper, UT average 4.9★ on Google across 5,452 reviews. Legacy Peak Estate Planning by Cutler | Riley has the top rating (5.0★), and Craig Swapp & Associates has the most reviews (2,330). Updated November 11, 2026.

10 companies that meet our bar: rated 4.5★ or higher on Google, with a meaningful review history (5,452 reviews combined) and currently operating. Request a call back and the company will phone you directly.

Legacy Peak Estate Planning by Cutler | Riley logo
#1

Legacy Peak Estate Planning by Cutler | Riley

5.0 ★★★★★ · 766 Google reviews
Estate planning attorney · 11681 S 700 E Ste 150, Draper, UT 84020

“Justin was very helpful and accommodating and gave great advice and council. He even took care of transferring the title of our rental property into our newly formed LLC as part of his service for setting up our…” — Google review

View reviews
Marianne Ludlow, Esq. logo
#2

Marianne Ludlow, Esq.

5.0 ★★★★★ · 312 Google reviews
Estate planning attorney · 2901 N Ashton Blvd #210, Lehi, UT 84043

“My wife and I needed a full and complete restatement of our family trust. After doing some research we found Mariann Ludlow who had an outstanding rating. We found out that she had completed estate planning for a…” — Google review

View reviews
Craig Swapp & Associates logo
#3

Craig Swapp & Associates

4.9 ★★★★★ · 2,330 Google reviews
Personal injury attorney · 9980 S 300 W #400, Sandy, UT 84070

“She was very friendly and helpful. She gave me a lot of good information and made me feel like they have my back. Thank you!” — Google review

View reviews
LifeLaw Trial Lawyers logo
#4

LifeLaw Trial Lawyers

4.9 ★★★★★ · 692 Google reviews
Trial attorney · 7440 Creek Rd Ste 401, Sandy, UT 84093

“They were amazing to work with. Kind people and patient. They were able to answer questions I asked and also would keep me updated as soon as possible. Working with Eva Flores was great as well, she was very patient,…” — Google review

View reviews
Randall Sparks logo
#5

Randall Sparks

5.0 ★★★★★ · 120 Google reviews
Estate planning attorney · 10610 S Jordan Gateway #200, South Jordan, UT 84095

“Randy and Brooke patiently broke down complex estate planning concepts into something I could clearly understand and guided me with kindness and patience as I set up my estate. They are warm, friendly, super…” — Google review

View reviews
Employer-Lawyer, PLLC logo
#6

Employer-Lawyer, PLLC

4.9 ★★★★★ · 302 Google reviews
Employment attorney · 12764 Pony Express Rd #300, Draper, UT 84020

“Spencer made it super clear for what I can do in my for my claims and made it sound super simple and complex. Highly recommended” — Google review

View reviews
Dean Smith, Attorney logo
#7

Dean Smith, Attorney

4.9 ★★★★★ · 177 Google reviews
Real estate attorney · 10421 S Jordan Gateway #600, South Jordan, UT 84095

“I found Dean on a whim just needing some quick legal advice before signing a lease on a commercial space. He ended up saving us on a bunch of fine line items we would have never caught, and negotiated on our behalf a…” — Google review

View reviews
Stephanie Pitcher Law logo
#8

Stephanie Pitcher Law

5.0 ★★★★★ · 87 Google reviews
Attorney · 765 E 9000 S # A1, Sandy, UT 84094

“Stephanie exudes intelligence. My case was fairly simple but bogged down by a dysfunctional, overburdened court with a prosecutor who simply did not communicate. Stephanie was able to get the case negotiated,…” — Google review

View reviews
Evershed Law, PLLC logo
#9

Evershed Law, PLLC

5.0 ★★★★★ · 82 Google reviews
Attorney · 10808 S River Front Pkwy #3067, South Jordan, UT 84095

“Nathan is the best, definitely would give more stars if I could! I highly recommend! Please reach out to him and his incredible team!! Saved me from life ruining charges! Cannot explain my gratitude for them!” — Google review

View reviews
Trujillo Law Group logo
#10

Trujillo Law Group

4.8 ★★★★★ · 584 Google reviews
Legal services · 1258 South Jordan Pkwy #303, South Jordan, UT 84095

“Tengo alrededor de 13 años trabajando con carlos y su team tuve el placer de trabajar con Yojana Cordova excelente atención respuestas rápidas y acertadas gracias equipo por su Apollo! Los recomiendo!” — Google review

View reviews

How we pick civil litigation lawyers in Draper

We scan Google Maps for civil litigation lawyer listings in and around Draper, keep only open businesses whose main category matches the service, and require a Google rating of at least 4.5 from at least 20 reviews. Companies are ordered by a confidence-weighted score that balances rating and review volume. We do not accept payment for placement.

Frequently asked questions

Who is the highest-rated civil litigation lawyer in Draper?

Legacy Peak Estate Planning by Cutler | Riley has the highest Google rating on our Draper list: 5.0 out of 5 from 766 reviews (as of November 11, 2026).

Which civil litigation lawyer in Draper has the most reviews?

Craig Swapp & Associates has the most Google reviews among the companies listed here: 2,330, with a 4.9★ average.

How are these civil litigation lawyers chosen?

Only open Draper-area businesses whose Google category matches the service, rated at least 4.5★ from at least 20 Google reviews. They are ordered by a confidence-weighted score of rating and review volume. Placement is never paid.